MSITM.com

Compare MSITM, MSIS, MISM & AI master's programs

MSITM Programs With Published Career Outcomes

Programs With Usable Published Career-Outcome Evidence

Most graduate-program websites publish some kind of career claim, but the evidence is not equally useful. This comparison highlights programs in the current MSITM.com database that publish a defined cohort result, placement statistic, salary statistic, knowledge/response information, or another outcome measure with enough context to interpret it.

This is a reporting-transparency comparison, not a ranking of career success. Different programs serve different student populations, and the statistics below use different methodologies.

Program Published evidence How MSITM.com reads it
UT Austin – MS Business Technology & AI Class of 2025 average starting salary: $110,360. Recent, program-specific starting-salary signal. Read alongside the program’s full career-outcomes page for denominator and role distribution.
Indiana Kelley – MSIS $82,250 median base salary, $5,500 median signing bonus, and 90% receiving job offers in their degree field. Useful because the school labels median salary separately from offer outcomes.
Arizona Eller – MS MIS 96% employment six months after graduation and 92% internship placement. Clear program-level employment and internship signals; applicants should still check the current cohort year/methodology.
Maryland Smith – MS Information Systems & AI 2025 employment report; reported base salary $95,321 average / $92,500 median. Strong methodology transparency, but salary data covered only 19.4% of job-accepting graduates, so the salary figure needs a prominent low-response caveat.
Syracuse – MSIS 2025: 93% average placement rate and $79,607 average salary. Program-specific current outcome with prior-year results also published, making trend review possible.
Michigan – MSI 2025 graduates: $91,000 overall average salary and 88% employment among those reporting a job outcome. Useful cohort report with an important caveat: outcomes were known for 52% of the graduating class.
Oakland – MSITM 2024–25: 24 graduates; 96% knowledge rate; 65% employed before/within four months; $59,816 average salary with 71% salary response. One of the more transparent small-program reports. Many students were already employed, so career progress matters more than a first-job-placement interpretation.
Baruch Zicklin – MSIS 2024–25: 156 graduates; 117 outcome reporters (75%); salary mean $95,571 / median $85,000. Employment counts have useful cohort context, but only 14 reporters supplied salary data, so the salary sample is too thin for a headline comparison.
Oklahoma State – MS MIS 2023 MS MIS: 79% had employment, job offers or other plans within six months. Useful program result, but the published 81% data-coverage figure applies across Spears master’s programs rather than specifically to MS MIS.
Florida – MS ISOM / IT School reports 93% placement for the Class of 2022. A real program result, but older than the strongest current examples; MSITM.com keeps the cohort year visible instead of presenting it as a 2026 outcome.

Useful evidence that answers a different question

Some programs publish valuable career information that should not be forced into the table above:

  • UMBC: broad alumni-market data covering 1,385 matched MSIS graduates and a $97,335 median salary—useful for longer-term alumni outcomes, not a single graduating cohort.
  • UT Arlington: published average graduate earnings in years 1, 5 and 10—useful earnings trajectory, not a placement report.
  • Virginia Tech MIT: reports that an average 76% of graduates across the last three cohorts received a promotion or salary increase within one year—career advancement for working professionals rather than first-job placement.
  • UConn MSBAPM: publishes a $125,000 highest reported salary—interesting, but a maximum should never be compared to another program’s mean or median.

What to ask before comparing two outcome numbers

  1. Which graduating class does the statistic describe?
  2. What percentage of the class had known outcomes?
  3. What percentage supplied salary information?
  4. Is the salary a mean, median, maximum or total compensation figure?
  5. Is employment measured at graduation, three months, four months or six months?
  6. Does “placed” include continuing education, military/service or students returning to a prior employer?
  7. Are international and domestic outcomes reported separately?

Career reporting transparency guide → | Jobs & outcomes hub → | Career paths & BLS benchmarks →

Last reviewed: September 18, 2026. Statistics are school-published signals using different methodologies; they should not be treated as a single standardized ranking.

MSITM © 2026 Frontier Theme